The Swerve,
Stephen Greenblatt
The book is advertised as How the World Became Modern – and
by the end the first step might be taken, but in fact for three fourth of the
book that is misleading. It is about – “(Gian Francesco) Poggio Bracciolini (February 11, 1380[2] – October 30, 1459) was an Italian scholar,
writer and humanist. He recovered a great number of classical
Latin texts, mostly lying forgotten in German and French monastic libraries,
and disseminated manuscript copies among the educated world.” (Wiki) and is his
life story with the most important accomplishment being the finding of the
text/poem of Lucretius in a remote monastery and having it copied and brought
back to the world after 400 years.
It is about the
first half of the fourteen hundreds and another of those periods of papal
irresponsibility and malfunctioning. He
had perfected his handwriting, which in this era of no computers, typewriters…
was a very important art. It was so good
that he rose to the position of private secretary to the first John XXIII
(first because he becomes excommunicated and removed from office and the name
was taken up again over 500 years later in 1958 when another pope took the name
John Paul.
It shows the
culture and life of Italy and Rome and is really enlightening history and
Poggio’s life culminates in the struggle that tried to unite the church under
one pope again – there were three. It
shows the degradation, sexual follies, financial mischief, the fortunes in
indulgences… At the conference to end
the divided papastry Jan Hus and Jerome of Prague came to offer their dissent
from the actions of the church – two admirable men who were given safe passage
to the convention where they were then arrested and burned (Hus) or jailed in a
dungeon for a year and then burned alive (Jerome). This is not a book to make you feel good
about religion (if you still do).
Poggio then goes
on a quest to find old manuscripts and his prize is Lucretius poem which opens
up many ideas (ideas that would get you killed in the upcoming inquisition –
another great religious invention). It
also tells a lot about books, libraries, and the fact that it is amazing that
we have anything from the age of the Romans left to us.
What did
Lucretius write in his poem Cari De Rerum Natura?
·
Everything
is made of invisible particles (atoms)
The church was against atoms just as it opposed the
heliocentric solar system and a moving and not flat earth.
·
The
elementary particles of matter – “the seeds of things” – are eternal
·
Elementary
particles are infinite in number but limited in shape and size
·
All particles
are in motion in an infinite void.
There is not beginning, end, middle or limits.
·
The
universe has no creator or designer
·
Everything
comes into being as a result of a swerve
It is the slight movements that create collisions,
combinations, shifts in events and objects.
If everything simply moved in straight lines the world would be simple
and we would have no life and no variety.
·
The
swerve is the source of free will
·
Nature
ceaselessly experiments
·
The
universe was not created for or about humans
·
Humans
are not unique
·
Human
society began not in a Golden Are of tranquility and plenty, but in a primitive
battle for survival.
·
The soul
dies
·
There is
no afterlife
·
Death is
nothing to us
·
All
organized religions are superstitious delusions.
·
Religions
are invariable cruel
·
The
highest goal of human life is the enhancement of pleasure and the reduction of
pain.
·
The
greatest obstacle to pleasure is not pain; it is delusion
·
Understanding
the nature of things generates deep wonder
Poggio brings it back, the church denounces its ideas, but
is somehow convince that it is okay as poetry – just don’t believe what it
says. Poggio goes back to work at the
Papal court and eventually returns to his homeland near Florence. He fathers 14 by his lover in Rome and
deserts them when he goes home and marries and settles in to an estate.
The text ends with a little ride through Galileo,
Shakespeare, Montaigne, and a few others connecting thought and philosophy to
this one piece of ancient Roman literature and the challenge it made to the
prevailing (forced) attitudes and beliefs.
Once I figured out the real path of the book and what the
author wanted to tell I enjoyed it and the good writing.
No comments:
Post a Comment